An important issue in the study of memory is understanding the relationship between objective memory performance and confidence in one's memory ability; a person's metamemory. In this study, we examined the relationship between metamemory and confidence ratings on an episodic memory task, and compared these results with those gathered in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm in forty-one college student participants. Each participant completed an episodic memory task asking them to identify as true or false thirty current events statements, and their corresponding confidence ratings for these statements. The same participants completed a recognition and a recall version of the DRM task. The number of correct responses for each participant was not significant related to their confidence ratings (r=0.26, p=0.10), but incorrect responses were significantly and inversely related to confidence ratings (r=-0.34, p = 0.03). Within the recognition task, those who selected the critical lure had lower memory performance on the current events episodic memory task (t=2.25, p=0.03).