Origins and Diversity
of Land Plants
Course
Bibliography 2004: A summary of the recent literature.
Introductory
and Overview Literature
Feild, T. S. 2002. Plant evolution viewed
through a functional and paleoclimatic prism. Amer. J. Bot. 89: 2034–2036.
Palmer, J. D., D. E. Soltis, and M. W. Chase
2004. The plant tree of life: an overview and some points of view. Amer.
J.
Bot. 91: 1437–1445.
Primers on
Phylogenetic Theory
Baldauf, S. L. 2003. Phylogeny for the faint
of heart: a tutorial. Trends in Genetics 19: 345–351.
Lewis, P. O. 2001. Phylogenetic systematics
turns over a new leaf. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16:
30–37.
Extinction
Benton, M. J. 1995. Diversification and
extinction in the history of life. Science 268: 52–58.
Solé, R. V., J. M. Montoya, and D. H. Erwin
2002. Recovery after mass extinction: evolutionary assembly in
large-scale
biosphere dynamics. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 357: 697–707.
Wilf, P. and K. R. Johnson 2004. Land plant
extinction and the end of the Cretaceous: a quantitative analysis of
the North
Dakota megafloral record. Paleobiology 30: 347–368.
Wilf, P., K. R. Johnson, and B. T. Huber 2003.
Correlated terrestrial and marine evidence for global climate changes
before
mass extinction at the Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary. PNAS 100:
599–604.
Evolutionary
Divergence and Estimates of Time
Benton, M. J. and F. J. Ayala 2003. Dating the
tree of life. Science 300: 1698–1700.
Hedges, S. B. and S. Kumar 2003. Genomic
clocks and evolutionary timescales. Trends in Genetics 19:
200–206.
Hedges, S. B. and S. Kumar 2004. Precision of
molecular time estimates. Trends in Genetics 20: 242–247.
Rodríguez–Trelles, F., R. Tarrío, and F. J.
Ayala 2002. A methodological bias toward overestimation of molecular
evolutionary time scales. PNAS 99: 8112–8115.
Sanderson, M. J. 2002. Estimating absolute
rates of molecular evolution and divergence times: a penalized
likelihood
approach. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19: 101–109.
Sandeson, M. J. 2003. Molecular data from 27
proteins do not support a Precambrian origin of land plants. Amer.
J. Bot. 90:
954–956.
Sanderson, M. J., J. L. Thorne, N. Wikström,
and K. Bremer 2004. Molecular evidence on plant divergence times. Amer.
J.
Bot. 91: 1656–1665.
Soltis, P. S., D. E. Soltis , V. Savolainen,
P. R. Crane, and T. G. Barraclough 2002. Rate heterogeneity among
lineages of
tracheophytes: integration of molecular and fossil data and evidence
for
molecular living fossils. PNAS 99: 4430–4435.
Morphology and
Development
Endress, P. K. 2003. Morphology and angiosperm
systematics in the molecular era. Bot. Rev. 68: 545–570.
Friedman, W. E., R. C. Moore, and M. D.
Purugganan 2004. The evolution of plant development. Amer. J. Bot.
91:
1726–1741
Kaplan, D. R. 2001. The science of plant
morphology: definition, history, and the role in modern biology. Amer
J. Bot.
88: 1711–1741.
Raven, J. A. and D. Edwards 2001. Roots:
evolutionary origins and biogeochemical significance. J.
Experimental Bot.
52: 381–401.
Plant Cells and
Biochemistry
Cook, M. E., L. E. Graham, C. E. J. Botha, and
C. A. Lavin 1997. Comparative ultrastructure of plasmodesmata of Chara
and selected bryophytes: toward an elucidation of the evolutionary
origin of
plant plasmodesmata. Amer. J. Bot. 84: 1169–1178.
Popper, Z. A. and S. C. Fry 2003. Primary cell
wall composition of bryophytes and charophytes. Annals of Botany
91:
1–12.
Raven, J. A. 2000. Land plant biochemistry. Phil.
Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 255: 833–846.
Southworth, D. and M. Cresti 1997. Comparison
of flagellated and nonflagellated sperm in plants. Amer. J. Bot. 84:
1301–1311.
Progenitors of Land
Plants
Cook, M. E. 2004 Cytokinesis in Coleochaete
orbicularis (Charophyceae): an ancestral mechanism inherited by
plants. Amer.
J. Bot. 91: 313–320.
Delwiche, C. F., K. G. Karol, M. T. Cimino,
and K. J. Sytsma 2002. Phylogeny of the genus Coleochaete
(Coleochaetales, Charophyta) and related taxa infered by analysis of
the
chloroplast gene rbcL. J. Phycol. 38: 394–403.
Karol, K. G., R. M. McCourt, M. T. Cimino, and
C. F. Delwiche 2001. The closest living relatives of land plants. Science
294: 2351–2353.
Lewis, L. A. and R. M. McCourt 2004. Green
algae and the origin of land plants. Amer. J. Bot. 91:
1535–1556.
Turmel, M., C. Otis, and C. Lemieux 2003. The
mitochondrial genome of Chara vulgaris: insights into the
mitochondrial
DNA architecture of the last common ancestor of green algae and land
plants. Plant
Cell 15: 1888–1903.
Coevolution of Fungi
and Land Plants
Brundrett, M. C. 2002. Coevolution of roots
and mycorrhizas of land plants. New Phytologist 154: 275–304.
Heckman, D. S., D. M. Geiser, B. R. Eidell, R.
L. Stauffer, N. L. Kardos, and S. B. Hedges 2001. Molecular evidence
for the
early colonization of land by fungi and plants. Science 293:
1129–1133.
Read, D. J., J. G. Duckett, R. Francis, R. Ligrone,
and A. Russel 2000. Symbiotic fungal associations in 'lower' land
plants. Phil.
Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 355: 815–831.
Fossil Record
Cheng–Sen, L. and D. Edwards 1997. A new
microphyllous plant from the Lower Devonian of Yunnan Province, China. Amer.
J. Bot. 84: 1441–1448.
Crane, P. R., P. Herendeen, and E. M. Friis
2004. Fossils and plant phylogeny. Amer. J. Bot. 91: 1683–1699.
Crepet, W. L., K. C. Nixon, and M. A. Gandolfo
2004. Fossil evidence and phylogeny: the age of major angiosperm clades
based
on mesofossil and macrofossil evidence from Cretaceous deposits. Amer.
J.
Bot. 91: 1666–1682.
Dilcher, D. 2000. Toward a new synthesis:
Major evolutionary trends in the angiosperm fossil record. PNAS
97:
7030–7036.
Edwards, D. 2000. The role of Mid–Paleozoic
mesofossils in the detection of early bryophytes. Phil. Trans. R.
Soc. Lond.
355: 733–755.
Gottschling, M. and H. H. Hilger 2003. First
fossil record of transfer cells in Angiosperms. Amer. J. Bot.
90:
957–959.
Graham, A. 2003. The concepts of deep-time
floras and paleobotanical hot–spots. Syst. Bot. 28: 461–464.
Kodner, R. B. and L. E. Graham 2001.
High-temperature, acid-hydrolyzed remains of Polytrichum
(Musci,
Polytrichaceae) resemble enigmatic Silurian-Devonian tubular
microfossils. Amer.
J. Bot. 88: 462–466.
Kotyk, M. E., J. F.Basinger, P. G. Gensel, and
T. A. de Freitas 2002. Morphologically complex plant microfossils from
the Late
Silurian of Arctic Canada. Amer. J. Bot. 89: 1004–1013.
Poort,
R. J., H. Visscher, and D. L. Dilcher 1996. Zoidogamy in fossil
gymnosperms: The centenary of a concept, with special reference to
prepollen of
late Paleozoic conifers. PNAS 93: 11713–11717.
Roth–Nebelsick, A., G. Grimm, V. Mosbrugger,
H. Hass, and H. Kerp 2000. Morphometric analysis of Rhynia and
Asteroxylon:
testing functional aspects of early land plant evolution. Paleobiology
26: 405–418.
Wellman, C. H. and J. Gray 2000. The
microfossil record of early land plants. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond.
355:
717–732.
Wellman, C. H., P. L. Osterloff, and U. Mohiuddin
2003. Fragments of the earliest land plants. Nature 425:
282–285.
Emergence of Land
Plants
Bateman, R. M. and W. A. DiMichele 2003.
Genesis of phenotypic and genotypic diversity in land plants: the
present as
the key to the past. Systematics and Biodiversity 1: 13–28.
Blackwell, W. H. 2003. Two theories of the
origin of the land plant sporophyte: which is left standing? Bot.
Rev.
69: 125–148.
Cooke, T. J., D. Poli, and J. D. Cohen 2003.
Did auxin play a crucial role in the evolution of novel body plans
during the
Late Silurian-Early Devonian radiation of land plants? Chapter 5 in, The
Evolution of Plant Physiology, A. Hemsley and I. Poole (eds.).
Academic
Press.
Duff, R. J. and D. L. Nickrent 1999.
Phylogenetic relationships of land plants using mitochondrial
small-subunit
rDNA sequences. Amer. J. Bot. 86: 372–386.
Graham, L. E., M. E. Cook, and J. S. Busse
2000. The origin of plants: body plan changes contributing to a major
evolutionary radiation. PNAS 97: 4535–4540.
Graham, L. K. E. and L. W. Wilcox 2000. The
origin of alternation of generations in land plants: a focus on
matrotrophy and
hexose transport. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 355: 757–767.
Kenrick, P. and P. R. Crane 1997. The origin
and early evolution of plants on land. Nature 389: 33–39.
Nickrent, D. L., C. L. Parkinson, J. D.
Palmer, R. J. Duff 2000. Multigene
phylogeny of land plants with special reference to bryophytes and the
earliest
land plants. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17: 1885–1895.
Renzaglia, K. S., R. J. Duff, D. L. Nickrent,
and D. J. Garbary 2000. Vegetative and reproductive innovations of
early land
plants: implications for a unified phylogeny. Phil. Trans. R. Soc.
Lond.
355: 769–793.
Soltis, P. S., D. E. Soltis, P. G. Wolf, D. L.
Nickrent, S. Chaw, and R. L. Chapman 1999. The phylogeny of land plants
inferred from 18S rDNA sequences: pushing the limits of rDNA signal? Mol.
Biol. Evol. 16: 1774–1784.
Bryophtyes and Land
Plant Evolution
Carafa, A., J. G. Duckett, and R. Ligrone
2003. The placenta in Monoclea forsteri Hook. and Treubia
lacunosa
(Col.) Prosk: insights into placental evolution in liverworts. Annals
of
Botany 92: 299–307.
Henschel, K., R. Kofuji, M. Hasebe, H.
Saedler, T. Münster, and G. Theißen 2002. Two ancient classes of
MIKC-type
MADS-box genes are present in the moss Physcomitrella patens. Mol.
Biol. Evol. 19: 801–814.
Kugita, M., A. Kaneko, Y. Yamamoto, Y. Takeya,
T. Matsumoto and K. Yoshinaga 2003. The complete nucleotide sequence of
the
hornwort (Anthoceros formosae) chloroplast genome: insight into
the earliest
land plants. Nucleic Acids Research 31: 716–721.
Mishler, B. D. 2001. The biology of
bryophytes: bryophytes aren't just small tracheophytes. Amer. J.
Bot.
88: 2129–2131.
Newton, A. E., C. J. Cox, J. G. Duckett, J. A.
Wheeler, B. Goffinet, T. A. J. Hedderson, and B. D. Mishler 2000.
Evolution of
the major mosslineages: phylogenetic analyses based on multiple gene
sequences
and morphology. Bryologist 103: 187–211.
Renzaglia, K. S., K. D. McFarland, and D. K.
Smith 1997. Anatomy and ultrastrcuture of the sporophyte of Takakia
ceratophylla (Bryophyta). Amer. J. Bot. 84: 1337–1350.
Shaw, J., C. J. Cox, and S. B. Boles 2003.
Polarity of peatmoss (Sphagnum) evolution: who says bryophytes
have no
roots? Amer. J. Bot. 90: 1778–1787.
Shaw, J. and K. Renzaglia 2004. Phylogeny and
diversification of bryophytes. Amer. J. Bot. 91: 1557–1581.
Wheeler, J. A. 2000. Molecular phylogenetic
reconstructions of the marchantioid liverwort radiation. Bryologist
103:
314–333.
Tracheophyte
Evolution
Carlquist, S. and E. L. Schneider 1997. SEM
studies on vessels in ferns. 2. Pteridium. Amer. J. Bot.
84:
581–587.
Carlquist, S. and E. L. Schneider 1999. SEM
studies on vessels in ferns. 12. Marattiaceae, with comments on vessel
patterns
in eusporangiate ferns. Amer. J. Bot. 86: 457–464.
Carlquist, S. and E. L. Schneider 2001.
Vessels in ferns: structural, ecological, and evolutionary
significance. Amer.
J. Bot. 88: 1–13.
Carlquist, S. and E. L. Schneider 2002. The
trachied-vessel element transition in angiosperms involves multiple
independent
features: cladistic consequences. Amer. J. Bot. 89: 185–195.
Ligrone, R., J. G. Duckett, and K. S.
Renzaglia 2000. Conducting tissues and phyletic relationships of
bryophytes. Phil.
Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 355: 795–813.
Friedman, W. E. and M. E. Cook 2000. The
origin and early evolution of tracheids in vascular plants: integration
of
palaeobotanical and neobotanical data. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 355:
857–868.
Kenrick, P. 2000. The relationships of
vascular plants. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 355: 847–855.
Schneider, E. L. and S. Carlquist 2001. SEM
studies on vessels in ferns. 17. Psilotaceae. Amer. J. Bot. 87:
176–181.
Lycophyte Evolution
Gensel, P. G. and C. M. Berry 2001. Early
lycophyte evolution. Amer. Fern. J. 91: 74–98.
Grauvogel-Stamm, L. and B. Lugardon 2001. The
Triassic lycopsids Pleuromeia and Annalepis:
relationships,
evolution, and origin. Amer. Fern J. 91: 115–149
Pigg, K. B. 2001. Isoetalean lycopsid
evolution: from the Devonian to the present. Amer. Fern J. 91:
99–114.
Svensson, M. E. and P. Engström 2002. Closely
related MADS-box genes in club moss (Lycopodium) show broad
expression
patterns and are structurally similar to, but phylogenetically distinct
from,
typical seed plant MADS-box genes. New Phytologist 154: 439–450.
Whittier, D. P. and J. E. Braggins 2000.
Observations on the mature gametophyte of Phylloglossum
(Lycopodiaceae).
Amer. J. Bot. 87: 920–924.
Wikström, N. 2001. Diversification and
relationships of extant homosporous lycopods. Amer. Fern J. 91:
150–165.
Monilophyte Evolution
Des Marais, D. L., A. R. Smith, D. M. Britton,
and K. M. Pryer 2003. Phylogenetic relationships and evolution of
extant
horsetails, Equisetum, based on chloroplast DNA sequence data (rbcL
and trnL-F). Int. J. Plant Sci. 164: 737–751.
Pryer, K. M. 1999. Phylogeny of marsileaceous
ferns and relationships of the fossil Hydropteris pinnata
reconsidered. Int.
J. Plant Sci. 160: 931–954.
Pryer, K. M., H. Schneider, A. R. Smith, R.
Cranfill, P. Wolf, J. S. Hunt, and S. D. Sipes 2001. Horsetails and
ferns are a
monophyletic group and the closest living relatives to seed plants. Nature
409: 618–622.
Pryer, K. M., E. Schuettpelz, P. Wolf, H.
Schneider, A. R. Smith, and R. Cranfill 2004. Phylogeny and evolution
of ferns
(Monilophytes) with a focus on the early leptosporangiate divergences. Amer.
J. Bot. 91: 1582–1598.
Schneider, H., E. Schuettpelz, K. M. Pryer, R.
Cranfill, S. Magallón, and R. Lupia 2004. Ferns diversified in the
shadow of
angiosperms. Nature 428: 553–557.
Spermatophytes and
Gymnosperm Evolution
Bowe, L. M., G. Coat, and C. W. dePamphilis
2000. Phylogeny of seed plants based on all three genomic compartments:
extant
gymnosperms are monophyletic and Gnetales' closest relatives are
conifers.
Burleigh J. G. and S. Mathews 2004.
Phylogenetic signal in nucleotide data from seed plants: implications
for
resolving the seed plant tree of life. Amer. J. Bot. 91:
1599–1613.
Chaw, S., A. Zharkikh, H. Sung, T. Lau, and W.
Li 1997. Molecular phylogeny of extant gymnosperms and seed plant
evolution:
analysis of nuclear 18S rRNA sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:
56–68.
Chaw, S., C. L. Parkinsono, Y. Cheng, T. M.
Vincent, and J. D. Palmer 2000. Seed plant phylogeny inferred from all
three
plant genomes: monophyly of extant gymnosperms and origin of Gnetales
from
conifers. PNAS 97: 4086–4091.
Crane, P. 1985. Phylogenetic analysis of seed
plants and the origin of angiosperms. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.
72:
716–793.
Gugerli, F., C. Sperisen, U. Büchler, I.
Brunner, S. Brodbeck, J. D. Palmer, and Y. Qiu 2001. The evolutionary
split of
Pinaceae from other conifers: evidence from an intron loss and a
multigene
phylogeny. Mol. Phyl. Evol. 21: 167–175.
Kellogg, E. A. and J. L. Bennetzen 2004. The
evolution of nuclear genome structure in seed plants. Amer. J. Bot.
91:
1709–1725.
Cycads, Ginkgo and
Gymnosperm Evolution
Bogler, D. J. and J. Francisco-Ortega 2004.
Molecular systematic studies in cycads: evidence from trnL
intron and
ITS2 rDNA sequences. Bot. Rev. 70: 260–273.
Brenner, E. D., D. W. Stevenson, and r. W.
Twigg 2003. Cycads: evolutionary innovations and the role of
plant-derived
neurotoxins. Trends in Plant Science 8: 446–452.
Dilcher, D. 2000. Toward a new synthesis:
Major evolutionary trends in the angiosperm fossil record. PNAS
97:
7030–7036.
Dower, B. L., R. M. Bateman, and D. W.
Stevenson 2004. Systematics,ontogeny,and phylogenetic implications of
exceptional anatomically preserved cycadophyte leaves from the Middle
Jurassic
of Bearreraig Bay, Skye, Northwest Scotland. Bot. Rev. 70:
105–120.
Farjon, A. and S. O. Garcia 2003. Cone and
ovule development in Cunninghamia and Taiwania
(Cupressaceae
sensu lato) and its significance for conifer evolution. Amer. J.
Bot. 90:
8-16.
Hernandez-Castillo, G. R., G. W. Rothwell, and
G. Mapes 2001. Compound pollen cone in a Paleozoic conifer.
Amer. J. Bot. 88: 1139–1142.
Holt, B. F. and G. W. Rothwell 1997. Is Ginkgo
biloba (Ginkgoaceae) really an oviparous plant? Amer. J. Bot.
84:
870–872.
Magallón, S. and M. J. Sanderson 2002. Relationships
among seed plants inferred from highly conserved genes: sorting
conflicting
phylogenetic signals among ancient lineages. Amer. J. Bot. 89:
1991–2006.
Norstog, K. J., E. M. Gifford, and D. W.
Stevenson 2004. Comparative development of the spermatozoids of cycads
and Ginkgo
biloba. Bot. Rev. 70: 5–15.
Poort,
R. J., H. Visscher, and D. L. Dilcher 1996. Zoidogamy in fossil
gymnosperms: The centenary of a concept, with special reference to
prepollen of
late Paleozoic conifers. PNAS 93: 11713–11717.
Royer, D. L., L. J. Hickey, and S. L. Wing
2003. Ecological conservatism in the "living fossil" Ginkgo. Paleobiology
29: 84–104.
Yang, Y. 2004. Ontogeny of triovulate cones of
Ephedra intermedia and origins of the outer envelope of ovules
of
Ephedraceae. Amer. J. Bot. 91: 361–368.
Angiosperm Origins
and Evolution
Barkman, T. J., G. Chenery, J.R. McNeal, J.
Lyons-Weiler, W. J. Ellisens, G. Moore, A. D. Wolfe, and C. W.
dePamphilis
2000. Independent and combined analyses of sequences from all three
genomic compartments
converge on the root of flowering plant phylogeny. PNAS 97:
13166–13171.
Bremer, K. 2000. Early Cretaceous lineages of
monocot flowering plants. PNAS 97: 4707–4711.
Carlquist, S. and E. L. Schneider 2002. The
trachied-vessel element transition in angiosperms involves multiple
independent
features: cladistic consequences. Amer. J. Bot. 89: 185–195.
Crepet, W. L. 2000. Progress in understanding
angiosperm history, success, and relationships: Darwin's abominably
"perplexing phenomenon." PNAS 97: 12939–12941.
Crepet, W. L., K. C. Nixon, and M. A. Gandolfo
2004. Fossil evidence and phylogeny: the age of major angiosperm clades
based
on mesofossil and macrofossil evidence from Cretaceous deposits. Amer.
J.
Bot. 91: 1666–1682.
Davies, T. J., T. G. Barraclough, M. W. Chase,
P. S. Soltis, D. E. Soltis, and Vincent Savolainen 2004. Darwin's
abominable
mystery: insights from a supertree of the angiosperms. PNAS
101:
1904–1909.
Endress, P. K. 2001. Origins of flower
morphology. J. Exper. Zool. 291: 105–115.
Endress, P. K. 2003. Morphology and angiosperm
systematics in the molecular era. Bot. Rev. 68: 545–570.
Feild, T. S., N. C. Arens, J. A. Doyle, T. E.
Dawson, and M. J. Donoghue 2004. Dark and disturbed: a new image of
early
angiosperm ecology. Paleobiology 30: 82–107.
Frohlich, M. W. and D. S. Parker 2000. The
mostly male theory of flower evolutionary origins: from genes to
fossils. Syst.
Bot. 25: 155–170.
Judd, W. S. and R. G. Olmstead 2004. A survey
of tricolpate (eudicot) phylogenetic relationships. Amer. J. Bot.
91:
1627–1644.
Labandeira, C. C., D. L. Dilcher, D. R. Davis,
and D. L. Wagner 1994. Ninety-seven million years of angiosperm-insect
association: paleobiological insights into the meaning of coevolution. PNAS
91: 12278–12282.
Mathews, S. and M. J. Donoghue 1999. The root
of angiosperm phylogeny inferred from duplicate phytochrome genes. Science
286: 947–950.
Sanderson, M. J. and J. A. Doyle 2001. Sources
of error and confidence intervals in estimating the age of angiosperms
from rbcL
and 18S rDNA data. Amer. J. Bot. 88: 1499–1516.
Soltis, D. E. and P. S. Soltis 2004. Amborella
not a "basal angiosperm"? Not so fast. Amer. J. Bot.
91: 997–1001.
Soltis, P. S. and D. E. Soltis 2004. The
origin and diversification of angiosperms. Amer. J. Bot. 91:
1614–1626.
Zanis, M. J., D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, S.
Mathews, and M. J. Donoghue 2002. The root of the angiosperms revisited.
PNAS 99: 6848–6853.