 |
Foucault: Key
Concepts
|
| |
Two Key Foucaultian Terms
Discourse:
an authoritative way of describing. Discourses are propagated by specific
institutions and divide up the world in specific ways. For example, we can
talk of medical, legal, and psychological discourses. Literary criticism
is also a discourse, as is the terminology associated with grading.
Power/Knowledge: a term Foucault uses to highlight the fact that
every description also regulates what it describes. It is not only that
every description is somewhat "biased, " but also that the very
terms used to describe something reflect power relations. Discourses
promote specific kinds of power relations, usually favoring the "neutral"
person or professional using the discourse (the lawyer, psychiatrist, professor,
doctor, etc.). In other words, to know is to participate in complicated
webs of power. |
1
|
The identities, feelings, and dilemmas we read
about and take for granted have histories, and these histories are related
to specific discourses. |
2
|
Because novels and poetry occur in relation
to the discourses of their time, they participate in this process of defining
and regulating. Or, to be more precise, regulating by defining. For
example, if a novel describes a character who is mad, it will further refine
and regulate the culture's definition of madness. It is no coincidence,
for instance, that many nineteenth Century novels have a "madwoman
in the attic." Other examples would be the increasing importance of
lyric poetry in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Lyric poetry describes
and individual's interior feelings. A Foucaultian would point out that this
also made the individual's feelings available for surveillance by others,
and even made the feelings available to be had. "You can't feel what
you can't describe," the argument might run, "and you can't describe
feelings without being influenced by the terms that various discourses make
available to you. |
3
|
We cannot escape coming to understand ourselves under
the influence of various discourses, but we can come to understand their
histories. Foucault called this process of researching discourse or idea's
history genealogy. Take, for instance, the idea that understanding
yourself is valuable and important. If we wanted to do a genealogy of this
idea, we might start with the notion of self-esteem promoted by psychologists
in the 1960s. Then we could look into ways that the notion of self-esteem
was related to the increased sense of an individual's importance that occurred
in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries as capitalism developed and individual
consumers became more important, especially the notion that people differentiate
themselves by the things that they buy. Looking back further, we might notice
the increased emphasis on the individual's salvation that Protestantism
encouraged. (Note how this is different than Marxism. What counts are institutions
and discourses, not simply economic structures). |
4
|
Foucault's contribution to literary studies
has been to encourage us to think about how no writer's description or categorization
is simply neutral. Instead we can think about how writers further, complicate,
or challenge the discourses of their time. |
| |
|