| |
Modernist novels have a different relation to
knowledge than the more familiar and accessible experiences found in realist
novels. In most novels, you read to find out what happens, and to participate
in constructing a common edifice of meaning. You typically have a protagonist
you identify with, settings that are accessible, and an authoritative narrator
who helps you distinguish truth from illusion and misconception. In a full-fledged
modernist novel, your task as a reader is to discover an uncommon
edifice of meaning of your own construction. Or, more accurately, to reconstruct
a narrative from the many possibilities that the text puts forward. This
is a process that makes extraordinary demands on your attention as a reader,
and requires that you attend carefully to the author's technique.
"Repercussive" is an adjective that occurs again and again in
this text. For Faulkner, the repercussive is more central than the original
blow. What counts is not cause, but effect. Not action, but perception and
memory. Not truth, but narrative.
Faulkner's form highlights the logic of subtraction, simplification, and
omission on which most narrative depend. Most narratives subtract multiple
viewpoints, simplify motives, or omit contradictory information. Faulkner's
by contrast, draws attention to narrative gaps, multiples perspectives,
and complicates, rather than refines, the narrative structures that we often
use to make sense of our lives.
The way Faulkner repeats and repeats psychological motifs ground by a traumatic
incident or fixed ideas makes his characters not so much two-dimensional
as obsessive. This is why he's a modernist instead of a post-modernist:
he believes in deep structures. Some representations, if not transcendent,
have much more weight than others. If they are not determinative, they are
at least definitive. |