|
|
Anglo Manhood vs. Mexican Deterritorilization
Ethnicity, Identity, & Violence
in Peckinpaw's The Wild Bunch
Sam Peckinpah frames his 1969 film, The Wild
Bunch, with two complementary images. During the opening credits, children
drop scorpions into a swarming mass of fire ants. At the end of the movie,
the Anglo members of the Wild Bunch gang fight to their deaths against a
similar swarm of indistinct, seemingly interchangeable Mexican federales.
In both cases, sharply delineated figures are overwhelmed by an undifferentiated
mass. Not coincidentally, this mass is "red": the red of the ants,
the "red" Mexicans, the red revolution sweeping Mexico (the film
is set in 1913), and above all else, the blood that arcs across the screen.
In 1969, Peckinpaw's slow motion mayhem broke new boundaries in the cinematic
portrayal of violence. It did this by breaking boundaries between bodies--obsessively
examining the ways that the borders between self and other, subject and
object, Anglo and Mexican, can be crossed, violated, and obliterated. Critics
typically discuss this violence in terms of the ongoing war in Vietnam and
the death of the Western as a plausible genre. The modern technology that
invades the end of the film, automobiles and machine guns, initiates a level
of mass violence that evokes the horrors of Vietnam and demonstrates the
obsolescence of a High Noon ethos. Instead of a clearly delineated
hero and villain facing one another on a deserted street, we have a white
man at a machine gun trying to hold off a racialized horde. Yet the fact
that the he fails to do so suggests that this is also a film about what
Deleuze and Guattari describe as "deteritorialization"--a potential
breakdown of masculine, racial, and national boundaries.
<Show Clips of ants & then
machine gun>
While the war in Vietnam may be a historical catalyst
for the film, its major axis of difference is not East/West, but North/South.
In the opening parts of the movie, Pike and his gang ride into the town
of Starbuck, Texas, disguised as US federal troops. This masquerade is possible
because of the increasing presence of US troops on the border because of
the revolution in Mexico. Only three years after the film is set, President
Wilson would order Pershing into Mexico to punish Pancho Villa for raids
on New Mexico towns (he had little luck engaging Villa). In the film, Texas
is portrayed as dangerous but familiar: a place where Pike and his gang
know the rules but consciously break them. In Mexico the rules don't hold.
For Anglos, it is the film's political unconscious, a place where both revolution
and apocalypse are possible. In the film's depiction of Mexico, Anglo viewers
encounter a mirror of anxieties that have little to do with actual pre-Revolutionary
Mexico. _To transpose a notion of Edward Said's, Mexico in the film functions
for the Anglo US much as "the Orient" functioned for Imperial
Europe.
In Peckinpah's Mexico, bodies mix and flow in ways Anglos may fantasize
about, but rarely enact. His Mexico offers access to a world of female bodies,
dissolving boundaries and "childish" emotions which the United
States denies Pike and his gang. In Texas, the gang almost shoots each other
arguing over gold; in Mexico, they frolic in a sauna. In Starbuck, Crazy
Lee forces people to march and sing at gunpoint; in Aqua Verde, Dutch and
Freddie dance harmlessly with the residents. As Pike and his men leave Aqua
Verde, instead of being shot out of town, they are serenaded. In Starbuck,
Dutch barely escapes town with his life; in Mexico, he is given a flower.
If Mexico in the film is portrayed as a place of unrestrained passion and
fluid possibility, the Anglo North is represented as being governed by individuality,
contract, and bodily self-control. As the gang rides into Starbuck disguised
as soldiers, one of the things they pass is a temperance meeting. This distinction
between cowboys and Christians is a familiar trope in the Western, but in
this case disguises a similar commitment to self-regulation. For example,
recent historians have discussed how temperance clubs and legislation were
actively financed by corporate capitalists as a vehicle for creating a more
reliable, disciplined workforce. This fit hand in glove with the gradual
consolidation of many ethnicities into a blander, whiter, Anglo America.
Instead of taking time off from work to drink or celebrate a saint's feast
day, European immigrant workers were encouraged to shed these pre-capitalist
habits in exchange for racial privilege. The predominant value in the North
is the self-control necessary to acquire capital, and this as of true of
the gang as it is of their capitalist foe, the Railroad.
In fact, the gang is actually superior in this regard to the forces of Anglo
law and order, including the US military. In a scene central to the movie's
commentary on Vietnam, the Wild Bunch successfully highjacks a train shipment
of military arms.
<Show Clip of the Train Robbery>
What differentiates the gang from the US military
(and from the Mexican federales) is its ability to execute goals
with discipline. In the film's terms, this discipline results from a specific
notion of contract. Pike governs his sometimes resistant gang by the maxim
that "when you side with a man, you stick with him." Clearly distinguished
individuals freely enter into contracts to protect one anothers' bodies
and acquire capital. Despite differences in age, intelligence, and physical
prowess, all gang members are putatively equal in their contractual relation
to one another. Although the ideal is often strained, it also idealized,
and ultimately becomes something the gang is willing to die for.
If Pike's code epitomizes these values, they exist in a polar opposition
anchored on the other end by Mapache, the general of the federales
in North Mexico, and along a border policed by Angel, the Mexican member
of the Wild Bunch. Angel is the sort who will eventually lead the revolution.
He agrees to participate in the arms heist only on the condition that he
is paid in guns that his impoverished countrymen can use in their struggle
against federales who spend as much time raiding the countryside
as they do fighting Villa's forces. Mapache, on the other hand, is portrayed
as slothful, treacherous, stupid, and childlike. In other words, the movie
finesses its racism by having "good" Mexicans and "bad"
ones. "Good" Mexicans, like Angel and his Pueblo allies, are disciplined,
efficient fighters, governed by ties of loyalty and commitment. "Bad"
Mexicans encapsulate those institutions and values that Anglo culture defines
itself against. In a cultural trope stretching perhaps as far back as Anglican
portrayals of Catholic Spain, Mapache's Mexico is a world of superstition,
feudalism, and titillating excess. The Oriental despot relocated to the
Americas. In contrast to Pike's freely-entered contracts, Mapache and his
followers are united by chains of wealth and patronage, power and appeasement.
In his almost Rabelaisian excess, he represents a world where the scripts
of liberal individualism no longer work. Gratification is immediate instead
of delayed. Power is overtly autocratic instead of ostensibly contractual,
and commodities are more important than capital.
Mapache, then, is a Harrigan, the US railroad baron who dispatches bounty
hunters after Pike and his gang, made uncomfortably concrete and immediate.
Harrigan controls men's bodies with laws and cash; Mapache does it with
guns and goods. And even Harrigan falls back on (others') guns, because
finally, in this movie, that is what control of the self and other selves
comes down to: the ability to inflict pain and death. And pain and death,
perhaps not surprisingly, are what the film falls back on when significant
boundaries threaten to become deterritorialized.
The orgiastic slaughter at the end of the film terminates several of its
structuring tensions. Angel, whose status in the gang had been tentative,
becomes worth dying for. (In brief, Mapache kills Angel for giving guns
to the villagers and the rest of the gang kills Mapache, sealing their own
fate). Pike, in deciding to shoot one of Mapache's German military advisors
as well, proves himself to be a loyal US outlaw instead of a mercenary traitor.
The seductive promise of Mapache's "barbaric" existence is rejected.
And a homoeroticism running beneath the surface of the film is allowed to
break out. Three homosocial dyads recur throughout the film: Pike and his
partner Dutch, Pike and his former partner Thorton, and the two other Anglo
members of the gang, Sykes and Lyle. Sykes and Lyle are perhaps the most
typical. Early in the film we find that they enjoying sharing prostitutes,
something we later see them doing. Just before going to try and retrieve
Angel from Mapache, they are haggling with yet another prostitute over whether
she should be deserves to be paid for two patrons or one. In other words,
sharing women conflates personal identities and boundaries. Because of a
woman's presence, they are able to take a pleasure in each other that remains
within officially heterosexual bounds. Dutch's ties to Pike are more intense
because they are less overt, finally becoming explicit in the final scenes
of the movie when they die together. The whole sequence of their death literally
breaks down racial and physical boundaries as blood--male and female, male
and male, Anglo and Mexican--runs together. The self-control that the movie
repeatedly values as Anglo is released in an orgy of violence and border
crossings made safe by the fact that it ends in death.
Thorton, Pike's former partner forced by the railroad to turn bounty hunter,
closes the movie. Though viewers are given numerous flashbacks of the two,
he only encounters Pike in the present when he finds his body among the
slaughter. After a pause before the spectacle of Pike's rigid hand still
clutching a phallic machine gun, he leaves Pike's body and takes his pistol.
This is in effect a decision to abandon bounty hunting.
<show clip of Thorton taking gun>
Shortly thereafter he joins Angel's people in their
struggle against the federales. To some extent, he serves as the
audience's structural proxy, a sympathetic observer who admires and outlives
his quarry. But his decision to become a different kind of outlaw at the
film's end, also contextualizes The Wild Bunch's relationship to
other films. On the one hand, The Wild Bunch serves as a middle term
in the transition from hero to outlaw to vigilante movies. No less than
Apocalypse Now this is a film about a will to power that official
military forces, whether US or Mexican, lack. Both Pike and Thorton are
capable of doing what needs to be done, and live by a code that others pay
lip service to, but are unwilling to follow when extreme dedication or sacrifice
is called for. If The Wild Bunch is a movie about the death of the
Western, it is also the gateway to the Anglo "male rampage film,"
a prelude to Rambo. If the traditional forces for upholding power
prove to be ineffective, the solution is to "go native" as Thorton
does by joining the Pueblo guerrillas. In a similar way, the disintegration
of white bodies in the final shoot-out prepares the way for the reintegrated,
cyborg bodies of post-Vietnam manhood. To the extent that the Western "dies,"
the monadic Anglo male, standing out in broad daylight and playing by inflexible
rules, dies with it, his body torn and scattered in a hail of mechanized
bullets. Only four years after Peckinpaw's film, viewers would see Yul Brunner
portray a gunfighter in Westworld who was integrated because he was
a machine. Yul Brynner, the impetuous Russian-American who seemed vaguely
mechanical to begin with, would pave the way for Arnold Swartzenhegger,
the similarly accent-laden and mechanical actor whose Terminator seemed
merely an extension of Anglo masculinity's reconstituted but increasingly
prosthetic nature in the postmodern era. The arc is from Pike's dead hand
clutching a phallic machine gun, to Brynner's machined replica of a phallic
male body, to Stallone or Schwarzenegger's steroid-enhanced body as a machine--an
overtly prosthetic, supplemented body ready to reinforce old oppositions
through newer, less traditional means.
Warren Hedges, English
Dept., Southern Oregon University,
4/97 |